Guides & Tutorials

API Integration for SMEs: Connecting Systems Without the Chaos

How to sensibly connect CRM, ERP, shop and more: From Zapier to custom APIs. Practical guide with decision aids and common pitfalls.

Jonas HöttlerJonas Höttler
January 29, 2026
16 min read time
APIIntegrationZapierAutomatisierungSystemeERPCRM
API Integration for SMEs: Connecting Systems Without the Chaos

API Integration for SMEs: Connecting Systems Without the Chaos

"Our systems don't talk to each other" - one of the most common sentences we hear from mid-size businesses. The CRM knows nothing about the ERP, the shop knows nothing about the warehouse, and in between: Excel and copy-paste.

API integration solves this - if you do it right.

Table of Contents

  1. What Is an API (Simply Explained)
  2. The 3 Integration Approaches
  3. Which Approach for Which Problem?
  4. The Most Common Integrations
  5. Typical Pitfalls
  6. Costs and Effort
  7. Checklist: How to Proceed

What Is an API (Simply Explained)

The Waiter Analogy

Imagine a restaurant:

  • You (System A): Want to order food
  • Kitchen (System B): Can make food
  • Waiter (API): Takes your order and brings the food

The API is the standardised way for two systems to communicate - without you needing to know how the kitchen works.

What APIs Do Technically

Your CRM                           Your ERP
    │                                  │
    └──── "Give me customer #123" ─────┤
    │                                  │
    ├──── { name: "Smith Ltd",    ◄────┘
    │       revenue: 50000 }
    │

API Call (Request): "Give me data for customer 123" API Response: The requested data in structured format

Why APIs Matter

Without API:

  • Manual data entry in every system
  • Excel as "integration tool"
  • Errors, duplicates, outdated data
  • Hours wasted

With API:

  • Automatic data exchange
  • Real-time synchronisation possible
  • Single source of truth
  • Time for more important things

The 3 Integration Approaches

Approach 1: iPaaS (Zapier, Make & Co.)

What is it? Integration Platform as a Service - ready-made platforms that connect systems.

Examples:

  • Zapier (market leader, easiest)
  • Make (formerly Integromat, more powerful)
  • n8n (open source, self-hosted possible)
  • Microsoft Power Automate

How it works:

Trigger: New contact in HubSpot
         ↓
Action 1: Create entry in Pipedrive
         ↓
Action 2: Add to Mailchimp list
         ↓
Action 3: Send Slack notification

Advantages:

  • ✅ No programming needed
  • ✅ Quick to set up (minutes to hours)
  • ✅ Many pre-built connections
  • ✅ Cheap to start

Disadvantages:

  • ❌ Limited logic options
  • ❌ Performance with large data volumes
  • ❌ Costs scale with usage
  • ❌ Vendor dependency

Costs:

PlatformFreeStarterPro
Zapier100 tasks€24/mo (750)€61/mo (2k)
Make1000 ops€9/mo (10k)€16/mo (40k)
n8n (Cloud)-€24/mo€60/mo

Approach 2: Native Integrations

What is it? Connections built by the software vendor themselves.

Examples:

  • HubSpot ↔ Salesforce (native)
  • Shopify ↔ Mailchimp (native)
  • Slack ↔ Google Drive (native)

How it works:

  • Activate in settings menu
  • Connect once (OAuth)
  • Data flows automatically

Advantages:

  • ✅ Supported by vendor
  • ✅ Often included free
  • ✅ Deep integration possible
  • ✅ Little maintenance

Disadvantages:

  • ❌ Only predefined functions
  • ❌ Not all systems available
  • ❌ Limited customisability
  • ❌ Sometimes only in expensive plans

Approach 3: Custom API Integration

What is it? Tailor-made development that directly addresses APIs.

How it works:

# Example: Sync customer from CRM to ERP customer = crm_api.get_customer(123) erp_api.create_or_update_customer({ "name": customer.name, "email": customer.email, "revenue": calculate_revenue(customer.orders) })

Advantages:

  • ✅ Full flexibility
  • ✅ Complex logic possible
  • ✅ Performance optimisable
  • ✅ No dependency on third parties

Disadvantages:

  • ❌ Development costs
  • ❌ Maintenance effort
  • ❌ Needs technical know-how
  • ❌ Longer implementation time

Costs:

  • Simple integration: €2,000-€5,000
  • Medium complexity: €5,000-€15,000
  • Complex (multiple systems): €15,000-€50,000+

Which Approach for Which Problem?

Decision Tree

Is there a native integration?
    │
    ├─ Yes → Use native (if sufficient)
    │
    └─ No
        │
        ├─ Is there a Zapier/Make connector?
        │   │
        │   ├─ Yes → Does the logic fit?
        │   │       │
        │   │       ├─ Yes → Use iPaaS
        │   │       │
        │   │       └─ No → Check custom
        │   │
        │   └─ No → Custom development
        │
        └─ No API available?
            │
            └─ Legacy system → Check middleware/scraping

Comparison Matrix

CriterioniPaaSNativeCustom
Setup timeHoursMinutesWeeks
Cost (start)€-€€€€€
Cost (scaling)€€€€-€€
FlexibilityMediumLowHigh
MaintenanceLowNoneMedium
PerformanceMediumHighHigh
Complex logicLimitedNoYes

Typical Scenarios

Scenario 1: CRM ↔ Email Marketing

  • Solution: Native (usually available) or Zapier
  • Effort: 1-4 hours
  • Cost: €0-€50/month

Scenario 2: Shop ↔ ERP (Orders)

  • Solution: Native (if available) or Custom
  • Effort: 1-4 weeks
  • Cost: €5,000-€20,000 (one-time)

Scenario 3: Keep Multiple Systems in Sync

  • Solution: Custom (hub architecture)
  • Effort: 2-6 months
  • Cost: €30,000-€100,000

The Most Common Integrations

1. CRM ↔ Email Marketing

Use Case: Automatically add contacts to newsletter lists.

Typical Flow:

New lead in CRM
    ↓
Segment assignment (by criteria)
    ↓
Add to appropriate email list
    ↓
Start welcome sequence

Recommendation: Native or Zapier

2. Shop ↔ Warehouse/ERP

Use Case: Automatically report orders to warehouse, sync inventory.

Typical Flow:

New order in shop
    ↓
Create order in ERP
    ↓
Reserve inventory
    ↓
Update shop availability
    ↓
On shipment: Tracking info to shop

Recommendation: Custom (too critical for Zapier)

3. Website Forms ↔ CRM

Use Case: Leads automatically to CRM.

Typical Flow:

Form submitted
    ↓
Create lead in CRM
    ↓
Calculate lead score
    ↓
Notify sales

Recommendation: Zapier/Make (perfect use case)

4. Accounting ↔ Bank

Use Case: Automatically import transactions.

Typical Flow:

New bank transaction
    ↓
Automatic matching with invoices
    ↓
Create booking suggestion
    ↓
Mark for review

Recommendation: Native (most accounting software has this)

5. Helpdesk ↔ CRM

Use Case: Enrich support tickets with customer context.

Typical Flow:

New ticket
    ↓
Identify customer in CRM
    ↓
Display customer history
    ↓
On escalation: Inform account manager

Recommendation: Native (Zendesk ↔ Salesforce) or Zapier


Typical Pitfalls

Pitfall 1: Duplicates

The Problem: System A creates customer. System B creates same customer. Now you have them twice.

The Solution:

  • Use unique IDs (not name/email)
  • "Upsert" logic (update if exists, insert if not)
  • Define master system (single source of truth)

Pitfall 2: Data Conflicts

The Problem: Customer data is changed in both systems. Who wins?

The Solution:

  • Clear rules: "CRM is master for contact data"
  • Compare timestamps (newest wins)
  • Or: Bidirectional sync only for certain fields

Pitfall 3: API Rate Limits

The Problem: Too many requests → API blocks.

Typical Limits:

SystemLimit
HubSpot100/10 sec
Shopify2/sec
Salesforce100k/day

The Solution:

  • Batch processing (multiple records per call)
  • Queues and retry logic
  • Sync during low-traffic times

Pitfall 4: Missing Error Handling

The Problem: Integration works - until it doesn't. And nobody notices.

The Solution:

  • Set up monitoring
  • Alerts on errors (Slack, email)
  • Regular check of sync status
  • Logging for debugging

Pitfall 5: Over-complicated Architecture

The Problem: Every system connected to every other = maintenance hell.

Bad:
CRM ←→ ERP
 ↕      ↕
Shop ←→ Marketing
 ↕
Warehouse

The Solution: Hub-and-spoke architecture:

Better:
         CRM
          ↕
ERP ←→ [HUB] ←→ Marketing
          ↕
        Shop
          ↕
      Warehouse

Costs and Effort

Cost Overview by Approach

iPaaS (Zapier/Make):

ComplexitySetupMonthly
Simple (2 systems)€0-€500€20-€100
Medium (3-5 systems)€500-€2,000€100-€300
Complex (many systems)€2,000-€5,000€300-€1,000

Custom Development:

ComplexityOne-timeMaintenance/Year
Simple€3,000-€8,000€1,000-€2,000
Medium€8,000-€25,000€3,000-€5,000
Complex€25,000-€80,000€5,000-€15,000

ROI Example

Starting Situation:

  • Manual data transfer: 2h/day
  • Employee cost: €30/h
  • Error rate: 5% → €500/month correction effort

Manual Costs:

  • 2h × €30 × 22 days = €1,320/month
  • Plus error correction: €500/month
  • Total: €1,820/month

Costs with Integration:

  • Setup (custom): €15,000 (one-time)
  • Maintenance: €300/month

Break-Even: 10 months Savings after 3 years: €50,000+


Checklist: How to Proceed

Phase 1: Inventory

  • List all systems
  • Document data flows (who needs what from whom?)
  • Identify manual processes
  • Prioritise pain points

Phase 2: Solution Selection

  • Check native integrations
  • Evaluate iPaaS options
  • Get custom effort estimate
  • Compare costs over 3 years

Phase 3: Implementation

  • Start with one use case (not everything at once)
  • Use test environment
  • Build in error handling
  • Set up monitoring

Phase 4: Operations

  • Create documentation
  • Clarify responsibilities
  • Plan regular reviews
  • Prepare for scaling

Conclusion

API integration isn't rocket science - but it's not automatic either. The right strategy:

  1. Start simple: Zapier/Make for first automations
  2. Use native: If available and sufficient
  3. Invest in custom: For business-critical processes
  4. Think long-term: Hub architecture instead of spaghetti

The biggest mistake? Waiting too long and continuing to work manually.


Next Steps

Want to finally connect your systems sensibly?

At Balane Tech, we analyse your system landscape and find the right integration strategy - whether Zapier, custom, or hybrid. Free consultation

Tags

APIIntegrationZapierAutomatisierungSystemeERPCRM